New game

[Scott Adams]

At 10:55 AM 9/4/00 +0000, you wrote:
>> I strongly agree with that.  Nowhere in the rules does it ever say "That
will
>> be covered in a supplement".  With P&P, you get everything you need to play
in
>> the one box.  You didn't have to go out and buy separate books and spend a
>> small fortune.  Gosh, I wish they would bring P&P back into print!
 
>
>It's a pity the system could not be wrested from AH's corpse when they went
>under.  The system as a whole is pretty sound, though it does have many
>rough edges that could use some smoothing, rule and die-roling strangeness
>that should be simplified and unified.

 Did what's his face ever try to contact hasbro after they got it?
Speaking of
him he
emailed me a long ago and said he was going to keep in touch over the summer.
Oh well.  Maybe hasbro (which is more computer oriented these days) could
be swayed?

>
>Given the amount of mind-power on this list we should be able to make a
>passible updated version, if it were not for the fact we could be sued. :)


 Therea always ways around it.  As long as its not 'published'.  For 'private'
use only and other such on the borderline things.  Many other groups have done
similar like the huge D&D sites and they never got sued.
 
Longshot - ZC of AdventureNet International Echomail Network
Fringe BBS - EWOG II - 904-733-1721
Telegard / Allfix Beta Site