Attribute Gen proposal for v2

[Sylverrs_ dragon]

My thought would be to add something like the proposed system as an optional
rule. I also think revising the generation system by eliminating fractional
multipliers might be a good idea. They were included originally to allow the
player more flexibility. Didn't think the math involved would be a problem
but it was.



>From: Albert Sales <drite_mi at YAHOO.COM>
>Reply-To: Powers and Perils Fantasy Roleplaying Game Mailing List
><POWERS-AND-PERILS at GEO.CITG.TUDELFT.NL>
>To: POWERS-AND-PERILS at GEO.CITG.TUDELFT.NL
>Subject: Re: Attribute Gen proposal for v2
>Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:07:41 -0800
>
>I think we ALL love the char gen process. However, I know that many people
>like to "map out" a character. These ideas are mainly for them.
>
>Scott Adams <longshot at DARKTECH.ORG> wrote:At 08:34 PM 2/11/04 -0500, you
>wrote:
> >This is his suggestion on characteristic revision. Though I personally
>love
> >2D10 rolls (wink) his system has possibilities. Will have to take a look
>at
> >it.
>
>Same here. I personally like the system as it is now. Though there could
>be debate about the multipliers...the Max and Current stuff. But its fine
>to me.
>
>Its just confusiong who shows what and such.
>
>
>Longshot - ZC of AdventureNet International Echomail Network
>Fringe BBS - EWOG II - 904-733-1721
>Telegard / Allfix Beta Site
>Website: http://users.cybermax.net/~longshot
>ICQ: 24436933
>

_________________________________________________________________
Check out the great features of the new MSN 9 Dial-up, with the MSN Dial-up
Accelerator. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/