[PnP] Gems

Tobie Bonahoom bonahoom at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 23 19:20:45 CET 2004


A thought I have about the gems is to allow for all other gems to be 
enchanted, however there would be a greater chance for abmyssmal or to have 
the gem have disadvantages because of the flaws or dullness.

Tobie


>From: "Sylverrs_ dragon" <abnaric at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl
>To: pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl
>Subject: Re: [PnP] Gems
>Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:55:01 -0500
>
>That is workable. Can also add option to jeweler whereby he can attempt to 
>improve a gem's qualtiy levels. Success yields increase. Failure yields 
>garbage. Partial success leaves as is and eliminates chance of improvement 
>forever.
>
>
>
>>From: Albert Sales Reply-To: pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl To: 
>>pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl Subject: Re: [PnP] Gems Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 
>>21:49:06 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>I agree that the requirements should be forbiddingly high. However, I feel 
>>that some medium flawless brilliant stones should be allowed minor 
>>effects. By adding brilliant, and a minimum size of medium, there would 
>>not be too many extra magic gems. Also, the power should be much weaker 
>>(about a quarter). For groupings, I would say no less than 5 medium 
>>flawless of equal clarity would do the trick.
>>
>>Sylverrs_ dragon wrote:For both game balance and what I feel is 
>>appropriate for the use of the material I am not predisposed toward having 
>>a system where every chip of precious gem can be magicked into something 
>>special. I will consider the suggestion and possibly think of a way where 
>>smaller items set in a magical items in series can equate to the require 
>>large, flawless jewel the system now requires. I see the change you 
>>proposed creating a game where everyone and their brother carries around a 
>>"golf" bag full of magic items they pick and choose from. I do not think 
>>that is appropriate.
>>
>>
>>
>> >From: "Alex Koponen" Reply-To: pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl To: "POWERS & 
>>PERILS" >Subject: Re: [PnP] Gems Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:19:39 -0900 > 
>> >I agree. On v.2 it would be nice to have a more gradual transition in 
>>magic >gems and jewelry. Having mid-quality gems capable of holding minor 
>>magics >but needing Large, flawless and brilliant gems to hold the most 
>>powerful >magics is a good idea IMHO. > > Alex > > 
>> >_______________________________________________ pnp mailing list 
>> >pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl 
>>http://abroere.xs4all.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________ Is your 
>>PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. 
>>http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________ pnp mailing list 
>>pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl 
>>http://abroere.xs4all.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – FREE 
>download! http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pnp mailing list
>pnp at abroere.xs4all.nl
>http://abroere.xs4all.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnp

_________________________________________________________________
Check out MSN PC Safety & Security to help ensure your PC is protected and 
safe. http://specials.msn.com/msn/security.asp





More information about the pnp mailing list