[PnP] Sizing your stones
Alex Koponen
akoponen at mosquitonet.com
Fri Oct 15 07:30:03 CEST 2004
Hi Richard,
I have a question regarding the size of gems, jewels and natural magic
item stones. You have 1 out of 10 being large in table 2.222.
In volume or weight what constitutes Large (as in large and flawless).
Does it vary from type to type? (Diamonds being smaller than rubies,
which in turn are smaller then emeralds...).
Specifically, what size would a Chalcedony have to be to be enhanceable?
Would it have to be in a specific form? Example Tiger's Eye?
Alex Koponen
P.S. Just a thought:
Would a ring require a more flawless / brilliant stone than a larger stone
in a brooch or hung on a necklace to be enhancable?
More information about the pnp
mailing list